Table of Contents
Spring 1999, Vol. X, no.2:
From the President's Desk, Jonathan N. Thigpen;
Is Youth Ministry a Vocational Career or a Sacred Calling?, Mark A. Lamport;
Special Report: Results of ETA's Constituency Research, Part Two, Jonathan N. Thigpen;
Adults to Become Active Participants in Sunday School, Thomas Hutchison
| by Jonathan N. Thigpen | |
|

Jonathan N. Thigpen
President
Is Youth Ministry A Vocational Career Or a Sacred Calling? Ten Objections to Formal Preparation and Professionalization in Youth Min.
by Mark A. Lamport, Ph.D.
According to the New Parish Ministers study (conducted by the National Pastoral Life Center), youth ministers have the shortest occupational life span among all parish ministers: "over one-third stay in the field one year or less. Even when remaining in the profession, youth ministers may rank just behind migrant workers in length of time in one place". 1
A startling thought, isn’t it? It makes me ask, "Why?" But then again, I think I might know!
Although one’s call should be the solitary basis for entering youth ministry, one’s preparation for the profession of youth ministry has been seriously neglected.
As we can all observe, one can be called but ineffective; whereas, one can be effective, but not called. It seems both factors— receiving a call and engaging in preparation—make for the kind of person most desirous for the long-haul in the profession of youth ministry.
Ponder this analogous hypothetical question. Can you imagine those who would like to become doctors or lawyers skipping medical or law school and jumping right in to their chosen professions? Obviously, it is not allowed. Why then is it acceptable and when will circumstances prevent this short-circuiting of people into youth ministry? Yes, I realize the profession of youth minister is a fairly recent invention, but the respectability of the profession is not held in terribly lofty esteem by those who observe youth ministers, especially those with little or no training or experience. Ill-equipped youth ministers who move into jobs which require considerable understanding of ministry principles, biblical and theological foundations, people and organizational skills, and spiritual maturity, yet lack the gifts, calling, or sufficient preparation are viewed with suspicion inside and outside the Church.
Following are ten arguments I have heard in conversations about issues related to preparation for youth ministry. I will respond briefly to each.
Objection 1: It violates the sacrosanct nature of ministry giftedness.
Education for youth ministry, especially formal education, removes the sacredness of God’s calling to ministry. While I agree the profession of youth ministry is underrespected, it is still completely justified for a Christian lay-person, who is spiritually mature but with no ministry preparation, to enter a full-time vocational ministry.
Response: Are all or even most of the persons entering the full-time profession of youth ministry mature Christians? Or, are some of them younger people who may be "trying this occupation on" to see how it fits in their quest for vocation or Christian obedience? Even if they are mature (which is less likely than we might desire), that in itself does not guarantee effectiveness in youth ministry any more than a mature Christian embarking upon a medical career without medical training. But it happens routinely in the profession of youth ministry.
Why do churches and parachurch organizations hire youth ministers who are clearly not prepared for the task other than their practical experience and attendance at several youth worker training seminars? Perhaps those hiring youth ministers too often settle for the person they know, or who the kids like, or who they can get away with paying less. But is the kingdom of God best served by sharper or duller instruments? Who is ultimately paying for these learn-while-you-go experiments? I would even contend the single major reason for the scandalous drop-out rate from within the profession of youth ministry is due to those who are not prepared to handle the responsibilities and pressures of ministry.
Objection 2: It is a common sense position.
Anyone can do youth ministry. No special training is needed. I have never heard of anyone complaining because their youth leader or Sunday School teacher did not have formal education in theology and ministry. Ministry is something that all Christians have been called to do, regardless of their educational background.
Response: True enough! I don’t hear that either. Yet, look at the ineffectiveness of average Christian Education programs, which typically produce a preposterous amount of biblical ineptitude. According to reliable research, no discernible behavior difference occurs in the lives of "students" after spending, in some cases, eighteen years in Sunday School. What I do hear is anguish from the unfortunate ones left behind after the youth minister has left (again) either to another job (less than two years on average), another profession (less than five years on average), or finally (and mercifully) to receive formal education. Let me be clear: formal ministry education is not the answer to all maladies in the world of youth ministry, but it’s a lot better than ignorance.
Is formal education required to be an effective minister for our Lord? Not necessarily. Is it suggested as a way to become more effective ministers for our Lord? I absolutely believe so!
Objection 3: It takes too much valuable time.
Preparation is often a consumer of too much time. Valuable time is wasted that could be spent actually doing ministry instead of just talking about it. We are all given a very brief time upon this earth, and it is a constant struggle to determine the most appropriate way to make the most of this time, and to honor our Heavenly Father.
Response: Granted, time is short (Psalm 39). We don’t want to waste it. But which is better—to spin your wheels in ministry for a long time and eventually stall or to take time preparing for a smooth ride with steady progress? How many graduates from ministry preparation programs resent the time or energy or money they invested preparing? Yes, there are some. But maybe the school or the student or some other circumstance is to blame, rather than the notion of education. Most youth ministers are grateful and count the knowledge gained an incontrovertible asset to their ministry.
Objection 4: It requires no extraordinary competence.
Jesus used ordinary people as apostles. Formal education therefore can’t be the answer. Read Acts 4:13, and you’ll see that the apostles Peter and John were "ordinary and unschooled" yet they greatly affected lives "because they had been with Jesus."
Response: This description of the apostles has often given comfort to people like me who are "ordinary folks" called to do ministry. And yet, the apostles were schooled! They were formally and informally instructed for a significant amount of time with Jesus, sometimes called the Master Teacher. What greatly concerns me are the indignant people in the profession of youth ministry who refuse sufficient training for their jobs because "they have been with Ideas books."
Objection 5: It is bound to sap one’s passion for ministry.
Education dampens the spirit; makes it sterile. I have seen college and seminary education take the fire and passion out of peoples’ ministry ambitions. A wise man once told me "the surest way to put out your fire for the Lord is to attend seminary!"
Response: There is a flagrant disregard for logic inherent in this line of thinking. This so-called "wise man" is not. Does anyone waving the "no need for youth ministry education flag" also assume that Jesus and other Church history figures were uneducated? That assumption is absolutely inaccurate. Jesus was highly educated. Can you name the greatest leaders in the Christian Church, of any era, who shunned education?
Objection 6: It is not a foolproof guarantee for success.
Education does not necessarily guarantee effectiveness. God isn’t going to necessarily make people more effective by them trucking off to school for two or three years.
Response: I also fail to see the reasoning in this statement. Where does the blatant fear or disrespect for higher education in ministry come from? Because of the tremendous need for those to work with youth in the Church, many churches and parachurch organizations are hiring people without the basic skills and theological foundations for youth ministry positions. With the advent of more than forty undergraduate schools with youth ministry degree programs, and a growing number of graduate schools and seminaries with similar degrees, a sizable number of formally-trained professionals are beginning to enter the marketplace. This will be to the benefit, not the detriment, of the kingdom of God. I can never argue that sustained and intentional ignorance is the more spiritual route to go.
I remain unconvinced that the mere act of becoming more educated, and therefore more effectively prepared to represent Jesus on earth, is less than important or harmful, as in some people’s eyes.
I am not saying that everyone necessarily must leave ministry to continue education. There are some valuable youth ministry degree programs or courses that can be accomplished without relocation.
Objection 7: It doesn’t nurture a heart for ministry.
Accumulating academic degrees doesn’t account for your heart. Having half the alphabet worth of degrees doesn’t make anyone a great servant of Christ. It’s what is in your heart that matters. Ministry training does not have to be a prerequisite for being a professional youth minister. There are many avenues into professional youth ministry.
Response: Of course it does not have to be a prerequisite, but why should this profession want less than excellence in terms of quality preparation? Why should people hold such a low view of this position by not mandating the standards of training for the job? Why would anyone apply this same, and I contend flawed, thesis to any other profession? God calls you to insurance sales, but you need no training? God calls you to teach English in China, but you need no training? God calls you to ministry, but you need no training? What responsible, discerning body of Christ would employ someone not properly prepared for the task? To argue that being in ministry is too spiritual an enterprise for human preparation is a dangerous and extremely naive point of view.
Objection 8: It is not necessary if one is already spiritually gifted.
Ministry positions should be determined by spiritual giftedness not education. Ministry is something that all Christians have been called to do, regardless of their educational background. Granted, it would not be right to place a Christian new in their spiritual life into a teaching position. However, I do believe that by its very nature, the qualifying of a particular Christian’s ability level to teach, lead, and minister is a very personal and individual thing.
Response: Absolutely, you are right—all Christians are to do ministry (Ephesians 4). But all are not called to do all ministry positions regardless of their educational background. Why do you think the profession has been maligned? Could it be partly because of the incompetence seen in some quarters? How many actually believe God will think we are wasting time when we step aside from ministry for more effective preparation?
I am appalled at the existing low standards of some in our country who assume positions of Christian leadership, including youth ministry. It is as though intellect and religion are viewed as uncomfortable acquaintances, and that eagerness and personality are more critical to an appointment in youth ministry. As I encounter European youth ministers, for example, there is a keener sense that they can think, read, articulate and write with an informed demeanor. This is obviously not the favorable case for many in North America.
I defy anyone to name the most significant people (in terms of effectiveness for the Kingdom, not popularity) in some arena of ministry who have not received formal ministerial education at least at the undergraduate level; in fact, many have undertaken graduate work or doctoral studies.
Objection 9: It is not likely to teach people to love and care more. You can’t teach someone to love kids. Passion is the most important criteria for youth ministry. Is formal learning really necessary for that? After all, at best our greatest teaching will probably do no more than make a tiny dent in their character or faith. They probably won’t remember what they learned on xx day of yy year from your teaching. But they will remember that you loved them when others may not have, and that you loved them in Christ’s name. So just love them. Whatever you do, just love them.
Response: Yes, you are positively right—the most important trait is the relentless and passionate love for youth and the profession of youth ministry. But that certainly is not enough by itself. If I have that same love for pole-vaulting but am not gifted to vault or not schooled in the techniques to vault with effectiveness, I should do what it takes to learn, if I desire potency. With your reasoning, people would skip all that and just begin this vocation in a hasty and foolish manner—a pronounced lack of honed philosophy and principles for knowing why and how to do the task. The view of the youth minister who feels they don’t need training must view their role as someone who simply leads games and hangs out with youth. Perhaps this is one of the factors contributing to the low perception of youth ministry within and without the Church. People get the idea that anyone can do it. After all, they reason, it just requires common sense, a flashy personality, and a love for fast food.
Objection 10: It is not for everyone.
There are many avenues into professional youth ministry. Some programs and schools are more effective than others in preparing someone to be a pastor to youth.
Response: Many avenues, but virtually all effective youth ministers dedicated to the long-haul, involve more than only practical experience. I certainly do not belittle the fact that God can use anybody in youth ministry—if they are called. But I also believe it is incumbent on called ones to go to their ministry tasks armed with skills and knowledge, passion and principles, cultural awareness and theological vision.
Oh, with regard to the question in the article’s title—the answer is "yes".
For Further Discussion
Following are some questions to pose as a means of discussion for adults with whom you work presently being trained for youth ministry:
1. Take some time to remember how you came to be involved in youth ministry. What was your experience of church during your teen years? As an adult, how did you become involved? Why?
2. Consider all the different tasks and roles that constitute your position. List the top ten skills you use in your ministry. Rate yourself on the skills you deem your strongest and weakest, then on skills most frequently used and most difficult to use. Identify some of the skills you would like to develop.
3. What aspect of youth ministry do you need to know more about? What is one practical thing you could do to further your sense of professionalism in youth ministry?
4. Which of the following factors have the greatest positive effect on your longevity in youth ministry? The greatest negative effect?
Adult team
Expectations
Funding
Parents
Staff
Vision
Resources
Youth
Senior Pastor
Other
5. What ministry skill would enhance your survival, if you were to develop it more fully?
6. What are the obstacles that most hinder your spiritual health? What practical strategies do you follow for cultivating your spiritual health?
Notes
1. Philip J. Murnion et al., New Parish Ministers, New York: National Pastoral Life Center, 1992, 52, cited in Robert J. McCarty, Survival in Youth Ministry, Winona, MN: Saint Mary’s Press, 1994, 7.
The Author
Mark A. Lamport received his formal training from Huntington College (B.A.), Wheaton Graduate School (M.A.), Evangelical School of Theology (M. Div.), Princeton Theological Seminary (M. Th.), and Michigan State University (Ph. D.). His involvement includes pastoral experience as well as classroom skills. He is a prolific writer and Christian Education network participant.
When reading a map, two points of reference are necessary: where you are and where you want to go. Once those two points are established, the only remaining issue to decide is how to get from point A to point B. Organizational strategic planning is much like reading a map. An organization must envision where it wants to go (its mission), discover where it is (its current situation), and determine how it is going to get there (programs and services).
The board of directors of Evangelical Training Association began such a strategic planning process in April 1997. The ETA board instructed me and our staff to thoroughly investigate where we were as an organization from the perspective of our various constituency groups. The findings were to be reported to the board at its annual meeting in April 1998. It was determined to divide ETA’s constituency into two main divisions: ETA members schools and the churches that use ETA programs and materials. The Fall issue of JAT contained the summary of research done with member schools. This article focuses on the survey results from churches.1
Next, survey instruments were developed to provide the data requested by the board. In addition to demographic issues, the board wanted to gain feedback on ETA’s past effectiveness as well as insight into current needs to help guide us in program and curriculum development. We wanted to answer these main questions: What is the demographic profile of the churches ETA serves? What kind of teacher/leadership training programs are churches providing? What does ETA need to improve? What new services should ETA offer? What additional subjects should be added to ETA’s adult education curriculum?
The Survey Design
The ETA management team decided to survey three segments of the church market:
1) Active ETA Customers (AC)—A random sample of churches who had purchased materials within the previous 24 months.
2) Former ETA Customers (FC)—A random sample of churches who had last purchased ETA materials over two years ago.
3) Evangelical Churches (EC)—A random sample of the approximately 200,000 evangelical churches in the U.S.
Survey forms were mailed to these three groups in January 1998 offering a free book for responding to the survey as an incentive. A total of 561 surveys were mailed to Active ETA Customers (sample from a total of 2,244); 488 were mailed to Former ETA Customers (sample from a total of 1,943); and 2,000 were mailed to evangelical churches (random sample from the master church list of Tri-Media Marketing Services.
Response to the survey was good. The highest response rate, not surprisingly, was from Active ETA Customers (128 of 568/23% response rate) with the Former ETA Customers (67 of 488/14% response rate) and Evangelical Churches (176 of 2,000/9% response rate) following not far behind.
Church Demographics Compared
One of the major purposes of this study was to determine the profile of the "average" ETA customer and compare that profile with those of Former ETA customers and the evangelical church at large. Questions asked of each group were: the size of Sunday morning worship, church location, area population, denominational affiliation, and dominant worship style.
| Sunday Morning Worship Attendance | |||
| AC | FC | EC | |
| Less than 150 | 51.0% | 42.0% | 44.0% |
| 150 to 299 | 20.5% | 27.0% | 31.0% |
| 300 to 749 | 20.5% | 18.0% | 21.0% |
| 750 or more | 8.0% | 13.0% | 4.0% |
| Location of Church | |||
| Inner City | 21.8% | 20.5% | 8.0% |
| Urban | 14.5% | 17.5% | 16.0% |
| Suburban | 39.5% | 46.0% | 45.0% |
| Rural | 23.4% | 16.0% | 28.0% |
| Vacation/Resort Area | .8% | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Denominational Affiliation of Church | |||
| Baptist | 28.3% | 32.8% | 35.2% |
| Independent/Non-denom. | 20.8% | 18.8% | 9.1% |
| Free Will Baptist | 6.7% | 3.1% | -- |
| Pentecostal (non-specific) | 5.8% | -- | -- |
| United Methodist Church | 5.0% | 6.3% | 4.0% |
| Assemblies of God | 2.5% | -- | 6.3% |
| Church of God, Cleveland | 2.5% | 3.1% | -- |
| Church of God (General) | 2.5% | -- | -- |
| Foursquare Gospel | -- | 3.1% | -- |
| Evangelical Free Church | -- | -- | 4.5% |
| Independent Fundamental | -- | -- | 3.4% |
| Christian/Churches of Christ | -- | -- | 3.4% |
| Church of the Nazarene | -- | -- | 2.8% |
| Others (25 denoms.) | 25.9% | 26.6% | 31.6% |
| Ethnic/Racial Make-up of Church | |||
| Predominantly White (70% & up) | 60.8% | 70.2% | 91.7% |
| Predominantly African-American (70% & up) | 25.6% | 20.8% | 4.7% |
| Multi-racial (less than 70% of any one group) | 6.4% | 4.5% | 1.2% |
| Predominantly Hispanic (70% & up) | 4.0% | 3.0% | 1.2% |
| Predominantly Oriental (70% & up) | 3.2% | 1.5% | .6% |
| KEY AC = Active ETA Customers FC = Former ETA Customers EC = Evangelical Church at large | |||
| The Church's Dominant Worship Style | |||
| AC | FC | EC | |
| Evangelical /Traditional | 44% | 51% | 50% |
| A variety of worship styles | 16% | 17% | 22% |
| Blended worship | 16% | 17% | 12% |
| Charismatic | 13% | 6% | 10% |
| Contemporary and/or Seeker-Sensitive | 6% | 6% | 3% |
| Liturgical | 3% | -- | 6% |
| Reformed | 2% | 3% | 3% |
| KEY AC = Active ETA Customers FC = Former ETA Customers EC = Evangelical Church at large | |||
ETA has always been a "niche" ministry. Since its inception in 1930, ETA has focused on providing programs and materials to be used in the equipping and training of adults. Although interdenominational in scope and international in distribution, ETA has never aimed to expand its ministry beyond this niche and thus ETA has not tried to be all things to all churches. ETA has known its appeal is limited to certain types of churches in need of what it offers.
The picture emerging from the above data is that the average church purchasing from ETA:
- Sunday Morning Worship Attendance between 100 to 250
- Considers itself either an inner-city or suburban church located in a city from 5,000 to 500,000 in population
- Is probably either Baptist of some type or independent/non-denominational in affiliation
- Is either evangelical/traditional in its worship, practices a variety of worship styles or features blended worship
- 40% of churches using ETA materials are predominantly non-white in racial make-up
It certainly makes sense that small to medium sized churches, with fewer specialized staff members, would utilize what ETA offers more than larger churches with more staff resources. ETA churches are predominantly conservative in their worship styles. Perhaps the most significant finding is the high percentage of predominantly African-American congregations and other minority congregations which use ETA materials. This has not been due to marketing efforts directed to those churches but rather that ETA programs and materials are a particularly good fit with the needs present in those churches.
Christian Education Ministries
Several survey items related to Christian Education.
| Christian Education Ministries in Your Church | |||
| AC | FC | EC | |
| Sunday School for all ages | 91% | 91% | 95% |
| Youth Ministry | 80% | 73% | 85% |
| Vacation Bible School | 74% | 79% | 72% |
| Children's Church Ministry | 59% | 61% | 69% |
| Small Group Ministry | 46% | 45% | 61% |
| Bible Institute | 34% | 27% | 14% |
| Senior Adult Ministry | 33% | 30% | 45% |
| Club Ministry | 32% | 46% | 39% |
| Singles Ministry | 27% | 22% | 26% |
| Other various ministries | 16% | 18% | 23% |
| Backyard Bible Clubs | 8% | 6% | 13% |
| Sunday School for Children only | 8% | 6% | 5% |
| KEY AC = Active ETA Customers FC = Former ETA Customers EC = Evangelical Church at large | |||
According to the survey, Sunday School may be losing some ground (between 5% and 9% of responding churches do not have a Sunday School for every age) but it clearly remains in first place among C.E. ministries. It was no surprise youth and children’s ministry were close behind Sunday School in popularity. I conclude the face of C.E. is undergoing change, but the teaching ministry of the church, whether it is called Sunday School or something else, will continue to exist. There will always be a need for trained teachers and workers as long as there are churches.
Christian Education Staff
The survey asked one question relating to church staffing.
| Paid staff positions who work in C. E. | |||
| AC | FC | EC | |
| Churches with paid staff in C.E. | 41% | 46% | 56% |
| Director/minister of C.E. Part-time | 23% | 23% | 18% |
| Director/minister of Children Part-time | 17% | 23% | 16% |
| Director/minister of Youth Part-time | 25% | 23% | 26% |
| Director/minister of Adults Part-time | 8% | 13% | 3% |
| Director/minister of C.E. Full-time | 21% | 3% | 26% |
| Director/minister of Children Full-time | 21% | 23% | 8% |
| Director/minister of Youth Full-time | 47% | 48% | 55% |
| Director/minister of Adults Full-time | 17% | 26% | 13% |
| KEY AC = Active ETA Customers FC = Former ETA Customers EC = Evangelical Church at large | |||
The survey revealed the more C.E. staff a church has the less likely it is to utilize ETA programs and materials. This certainly fits what we had hypothesized. It makes sense that paid church C.E. will tend to develop their own materials for training and equipping rather than purchase pre-packaged materials from ETA or another source.
The data also revealed the dominant C.E. staff position is in youth ministry with children’s ministry staff not far behind. This certainly fits the common assumption that C.E. ministry has moved into specialization rather than generalization in terms of staff responsibility.
Teacher/Leadership Training
Several questions were asked relating specifically to how, when and why Teacher/Leadership training takes place in the church.
| Frequency of Teacher/Worker Meetings | |||
| AC | FC | EC | |
| No meetings | 13% | 12% | 18% |
| Once a year | 9% | 10% | 12% |
| Twice a year | 14% | 14% | 16% |
| Once a quarter | 28% | 22% | 28% |
| Once a month | 18% | 22% | 15% |
| Once a week | 9% | 6% | 2% |
| Each department sets up its own | 9% | 14% | 9% |
| The purpose of Teacher/Worker Meetings | |||
| Organizational maintenance | 81% | 84% | 84% |
| Training of teachers/workers | 60% | 52% | 60% |
| Prayer | 46% | 41% | 40% |
| Follow-up of members/prospects | 19% | 20% | 16% |
| Study of next week's lesson | 12% | 14% | 6% |
| KEY AC = Active ETA Customers FC = Former ETA Customers EC = Evangelical Church at large | |||
| © 1998 ETA |
Motivating Adults to Become Active Participants in Sunday School: An Analysis of Perceptions of Classroom Environment
| by Thomas Hutchison, Ph.D. | |
|