From the President's Desk

by Jonathan N. Thigpen
As one who has spent his entire adult life in various forms of Christian Education, it is exciting to see the continued development of scholars and leaders in our discipline. Although there are many unanswered questions and areas that deserve additional research, as a field of ministry within the church and study within institutions of higher education, we have much for which to be thankful.

One of the joys for me in the ministry of ETA is our involvement with the many facets of Christian education spanning everything from local church adult curriculum guidance to the college president’s manuscript for a new textbook. This issue of JAT covers a similarly wide spectrum. Mark Lamport, who has contributed to JAT before, deals with an issue directly confronting churches, schools, and prospective youth ministers. Is there a choice between God’s call on one’s life to youth ministry and seeking formal training for such a position? Mark pulls no punches in his rapid-fire objection/response format.

The next article is the second part to my overview of ETA’s research into our various constituency groups. This article explores what churches are doing in the area of adult leadership training and the resources and materials for which they are looking.

Thomas Hutchison rounds out this issue by sharing a summary of his recently completed doctoral dissertation research. Hutchison’s research has much to say to both the local church as well as any educational institution working with adults.

When I taught at the Bible college level, I remember well the evaluations my students would dutifully complete each semester. A few weeks later, I would receive summaries of their evaluations for each of my classes (via Likert-scale) in a faculty meeting dedicated to evaluations. While I was encouraged by the administration to improve my teaching, seldom was anything specifically discussed, other than hopeful expressions to "improve" scores on the next round of student evaluations. Hutchison’s research suggests there may be a better way to evaluate adult classroom settings by asking students not only "what is" but what they believe would make it better.

Thanks for your positive comments about the redesign of JAT. We look forward to hearing from you concerning this issue and receiving your submissions for future issues as well.

sig.gif (491 bytes)
Jonathan N. Thigpen
President

Is Youth Ministry A Vocational Career Or a Sacred Calling? Ten Objections to Formal Preparation and Professionalization in Youth Min.

 by Mark A. Lamport, Ph.D.

According to the New Parish Ministers study (conducted by the National Pastoral Life Center), youth ministers have the shortest occupational life span among all parish ministers: "over one-third stay in the field one year or less. Even when remaining in the profession, youth ministers may rank just behind migrant workers in length of time in one place". 1

A startling thought, isn’t it? It makes me ask, "Why?" But then again, I think I might know!

Although one’s call should be the solitary basis for entering youth ministry, one’s preparation for the profession of youth ministry has been seriously neglected.

As we can all observe, one can be called but ineffective; whereas, one can be effective, but not called. It seems both factors— receiving a call and engaging in preparation—make for the kind of person most desirous for the long-haul in the profession of youth ministry.

Ponder this analogous hypothetical question. Can you imagine those who would like to become doctors or lawyers skipping medical or law school and jumping right in to their chosen professions? Obviously, it is not allowed. Why then is it acceptable and when will circumstances prevent this short-circuiting of people into youth ministry? Yes, I realize the profession of youth minister is a fairly recent invention, but the respectability of the profession is not held in terribly lofty esteem by those who observe youth ministers, especially those with little or no training or experience. Ill-equipped youth ministers who move into jobs which require considerable understanding of ministry principles, biblical and theological foundations, people and organizational skills, and spiritual maturity, yet lack the gifts, calling, or sufficient preparation are viewed with suspicion inside and outside the Church.

Following are ten arguments I have heard in conversations about issues related to preparation for youth ministry. I will respond briefly to each.

Objection 1: It violates the sacrosanct nature of ministry giftedness.

Education for youth ministry, especially formal education, removes the sacredness of God’s calling to ministry. While I agree the profession of youth ministry is underrespected, it is still completely justified for a Christian lay-person, who is spiritually mature but with no ministry preparation, to enter a full-time vocational ministry.

Response: Are all or even most of the persons entering the full-time profession of youth ministry mature Christians? Or, are some of them younger people who may be "trying this occupation on" to see how it fits in their quest for vocation or Christian obedience? Even if they are mature (which is less likely than we might desire), that in itself does not guarantee effectiveness in youth ministry any more than a mature Christian embarking upon a medical career without medical training. But it happens routinely in the profession of youth ministry.

Why do churches and parachurch organizations hire youth ministers who are clearly not prepared for the task other than their practical experience and attendance at several youth worker training seminars? Perhaps those hiring youth ministers too often settle for the person they know, or who the kids like, or who they can get away with paying less. But is the kingdom of God best served by sharper or duller instruments? Who is ultimately paying for these learn-while-you-go experiments? I would even contend the single major reason for the scandalous drop-out rate from within the profession of youth ministry is due to those who are not prepared to handle the responsibilities and pressures of ministry.

Objection 2: It is a common sense position.

Anyone can do youth ministry. No special training is needed. I have never heard of anyone complaining because their youth leader or Sunday School teacher did not have formal education in theology and ministry. Ministry is something that all Christians have been called to do, regardless of their educational background.

Response: True enough! I don’t hear that either. Yet, look at the ineffectiveness of average Christian Education programs, which typically produce a preposterous amount of biblical ineptitude. According to reliable research, no discernible behavior difference occurs in the lives of "students" after spending, in some cases, eighteen years in Sunday School. What I do hear is anguish from the unfortunate ones left behind after the youth minister has left (again) either to another job (less than two years on average), another profession (less than five years on average), or finally (and mercifully) to receive formal education. Let me be clear: formal ministry education is not the answer to all maladies in the world of youth ministry, but it’s a lot better than ignorance.

Is formal education required to be an effective minister for our Lord? Not necessarily. Is it suggested as a way to become more effective ministers for our Lord? I absolutely believe so!

Objection 3: It takes too much valuable time.

Preparation is often a consumer of too much time. Valuable time is wasted that could be spent actually doing ministry instead of just talking about it. We are all given a very brief time upon this earth, and it is a constant struggle to determine the most appropriate way to make the most of this time, and to honor our Heavenly Father.

Response: Granted, time is short (Psalm 39). We don’t want to waste it. But which is better—to spin your wheels in ministry for a long time and eventually stall or to take time preparing for a smooth ride with steady progress? How many graduates from ministry preparation programs resent the time or energy or money they invested preparing? Yes, there are some. But maybe the school or the student or some other circumstance is to blame, rather than the notion of education. Most youth ministers are grateful and count the knowledge gained an incontrovertible asset to their ministry.

Objection 4: It requires no extraordinary competence.

Jesus used ordinary people as apostles. Formal education therefore can’t be the answer. Read Acts 4:13, and you’ll see that the apostles Peter and John were "ordinary and unschooled" yet they greatly affected lives "because they had been with Jesus."

Response: This description of the apostles has often given comfort to people like me who are "ordinary folks" called to do ministry. And yet, the apostles were schooled! They were formally and informally instructed for a significant amount of time with Jesus, sometimes called the Master Teacher. What greatly concerns me are the indignant people in the profession of youth ministry who refuse sufficient training for their jobs because "they have been with Ideas books."

Objection 5: It is bound to sap one’s passion for ministry.

Education dampens the spirit; makes it sterile. I have seen college and seminary education take the fire and passion out of peoples’ ministry ambitions. A wise man once told me "the surest way to put out your fire for the Lord is to attend seminary!"

Response: There is a flagrant disregard for logic inherent in this line of thinking. This so-called "wise man" is not. Does anyone waving the "no need for youth ministry education flag" also assume that Jesus and other Church history figures were uneducated? That assumption is absolutely inaccurate. Jesus was highly educated. Can you name the greatest leaders in the Christian Church, of any era, who shunned education?

Objection 6: It is not a foolproof guarantee for success.

Education does not necessarily guarantee effectiveness. God isn’t going to necessarily make people more effective by them trucking off to school for two or three years.

Response: I also fail to see the reasoning in this statement. Where does the blatant fear or disrespect for higher education in ministry come from? Because of the tremendous need for those to work with youth in the Church, many churches and parachurch organizations are hiring people without the basic skills and theological foundations for youth ministry positions. With the advent of more than forty undergraduate schools with youth ministry degree programs, and a growing number of graduate schools and seminaries with similar degrees, a sizable number of formally-trained professionals are beginning to enter the marketplace. This will be to the benefit, not the detriment, of the kingdom of God. I can never argue that sustained and intentional ignorance is the more spiritual route to go.

I remain unconvinced that the mere act of becoming more educated, and therefore more effectively prepared to represent Jesus on earth, is less than important or harmful, as in some people’s eyes.

I am not saying that everyone necessarily must leave ministry to continue education. There are some valuable youth ministry degree programs or courses that can be accomplished without relocation.

Objection 7: It doesn’t nurture a heart for ministry.

Accumulating academic degrees doesn’t account for your heart. Having half the alphabet worth of degrees doesn’t make anyone a great servant of Christ. It’s what is in your heart that matters. Ministry training does not have to be a prerequisite for being a professional youth minister. There are many avenues into professional youth ministry.

Response: Of course it does not have to be a prerequisite, but why should this profession want less than excellence in terms of quality preparation? Why should people hold such a low view of this position by not mandating the standards of training for the job? Why would anyone apply this same, and I contend flawed, thesis to any other profession? God calls you to insurance sales, but you need no training? God calls you to teach English in China, but you need no training? God calls you to ministry, but you need no training? What responsible, discerning body of Christ would employ someone not properly prepared for the task? To argue that being in ministry is too spiritual an enterprise for human preparation is a dangerous and extremely naive point of view.

Objection 8: It is not necessary if one is already spiritually gifted.

Ministry positions should be determined by spiritual giftedness not education. Ministry is something that all Christians have been called to do, regardless of their educational background. Granted, it would not be right to place a Christian new in their spiritual life into a teaching position. However, I do believe that by its very nature, the qualifying of a particular Christian’s ability level to teach, lead, and minister is a very personal and individual thing.

Response: Absolutely, you are right—all Christians are to do ministry (Ephesians 4). But all are not called to do all ministry positions regardless of their educational background. Why do you think the profession has been maligned? Could it be partly because of the incompetence seen in some quarters? How many actually believe God will think we are wasting time when we step aside from ministry for more effective preparation?

I am appalled at the existing low standards of some in our country who assume positions of Christian leadership, including youth ministry. It is as though intellect and religion are viewed as uncomfortable acquaintances, and that eagerness and personality are more critical to an appointment in youth ministry. As I encounter European youth ministers, for example, there is a keener sense that they can think, read, articulate and write with an informed demeanor. This is obviously not the favorable case for many in North America.

I defy anyone to name the most significant people (in terms of effectiveness for the Kingdom, not popularity) in some arena of ministry who have not received formal ministerial education at least at the undergraduate level; in fact, many have undertaken graduate work or doctoral studies.

Objection 9: It is not likely to teach people to love and care more. You can’t teach someone to love kids. Passion is the most important criteria for youth ministry. Is formal learning really necessary for that? After all, at best our greatest teaching will probably do no more than make a tiny dent in their character or faith. They probably won’t remember what they learned on xx day of yy year from your teaching. But they will remember that you loved them when others may not have, and that you loved them in Christ’s name. So just love them. Whatever you do, just love them.

Response: Yes, you are positively right—the most important trait is the relentless and passionate love for youth and the profession of youth ministry. But that certainly is not enough by itself. If I have that same love for pole-vaulting but am not gifted to vault or not schooled in the techniques to vault with effectiveness, I should do what it takes to learn, if I desire potency. With your reasoning, people would skip all that and just begin this vocation in a hasty and foolish manner—a pronounced lack of honed philosophy and principles for knowing why and how to do the task. The view of the youth minister who feels they don’t need training must view their role as someone who simply leads games and hangs out with youth. Perhaps this is one of the factors contributing to the low perception of youth ministry within and without the Church. People get the idea that anyone can do it. After all, they reason, it just requires common sense, a flashy personality, and a love for fast food.

Objection 10: It is not for everyone.

There are many avenues into professional youth ministry. Some programs and schools are more effective than others in preparing someone to be a pastor to youth.

Response: Many avenues, but virtually all effective youth ministers dedicated to the long-haul, involve more than only practical experience. I certainly do not belittle the fact that God can use anybody in youth ministry—if they are called. But I also believe it is incumbent on called ones to go to their ministry tasks armed with skills and knowledge, passion and principles, cultural awareness and theological vision.

Oh, with regard to the question in the article’s title—the answer is "yes".

For Further Discussion

Following are some questions to pose as a means of discussion for adults with whom you work presently being trained for youth ministry:

1. Take some time to remember how you came to be involved in youth ministry. What was your experience of church during your teen years? As an adult, how did you become involved? Why?

2. Consider all the different tasks and roles that constitute your position. List the top ten skills you use in your ministry. Rate yourself on the skills you deem your strongest and weakest, then on skills most frequently used and most difficult to use. Identify some of the skills you would like to develop.

3. What aspect of youth ministry do you need to know more about? What is one practical thing you could do to further your sense of professionalism in youth ministry?

4. Which of the following factors have the greatest positive effect on your longevity in youth ministry? The greatest negative effect?

Adult team
Expectations
Funding
Parents
Staff
Vision
Resources
Youth
Senior Pastor
Other

5. What ministry skill would enhance your survival, if you were to develop it more fully?

6. What are the obstacles that most hinder your spiritual health? What practical strategies do you follow for cultivating your spiritual health?

Notes

1. Philip J. Murnion et al., New Parish Ministers, New York: National Pastoral Life Center, 1992, 52, cited in Robert J. McCarty, Survival in Youth Ministry, Winona, MN: Saint Mary’s Press, 1994, 7.

The Author

Mark A. Lamport received his formal training from Huntington College (B.A.), Wheaton Graduate School (M.A.), Evangelical School of Theology (M. Div.), Princeton Theological Seminary (M. Th.), and Michigan State University (Ph. D.). His involvement includes pastoral experience as well as classroom skills. He is a prolific writer and Christian Education network participant.

Special Report: Results of ETA's Constituency Research, Part Two

When reading a map, two points of reference are necessary: where you are and where you want to go. Once those two points are established, the only remaining issue to decide is how to get from point A to point B. Organizational strategic planning is much like reading a map. An organization must envision where it wants to go (its mission), discover where it is (its current situation), and determine how it is going to get there (programs and services).

The board of directors of Evangelical Training Association began such a strategic planning process in April 1997. The ETA board instructed me and our staff to thoroughly investigate where we were as an organization from the perspective of our various constituency groups. The findings were to be reported to the board at its annual meeting in April 1998. It was determined to divide ETA’s constituency into two main divisions: ETA members schools and the churches that use ETA programs and materials. The Fall issue of JAT contained the summary of research done with member schools. This article focuses on the survey results from churches.1

Next, survey instruments were developed to provide the data requested by the board. In addition to demographic issues, the board wanted to gain feedback on ETA’s past effectiveness as well as insight into current needs to help guide us in program and curriculum development. We wanted to answer these main questions: What is the demographic profile of the churches ETA serves? What kind of teacher/leadership training programs are churches providing? What does ETA need to improve? What new services should ETA offer? What additional subjects should be added to ETA’s adult education curriculum?

The Survey Design

The ETA management team decided to survey three segments of the church market:

1) Active ETA Customers (AC)—A random sample of churches who had purchased materials within the previous 24 months.

2) Former ETA Customers (FC)—A random sample of churches who had last purchased ETA materials over two years ago.

3) Evangelical Churches (EC)—A random sample of the approximately 200,000 evangelical churches in the U.S.

Survey forms were mailed to these three groups in January 1998 offering a free book for responding to the survey as an incentive. A total of 561 surveys were mailed to Active ETA Customers (sample from a total of 2,244); 488 were mailed to Former ETA Customers (sample from a total of 1,943); and 2,000 were mailed to evangelical churches (random sample from the master church list of Tri-Media Marketing Services.

Response to the survey was good. The highest response rate, not surprisingly, was from Active ETA Customers (128 of 568/23% response rate) with the Former ETA Customers (67 of 488/14% response rate) and Evangelical Churches (176 of 2,000/9% response rate) following not far behind.

Church Demographics Compared

One of the major purposes of this study was to determine the profile of the "average" ETA customer and compare that profile with those of Former ETA customers and the evangelical church at large. Questions asked of each group were: the size of Sunday morning worship, church location, area population, denominational affiliation, and dominant worship style.

Sunday Morning Worship Attendance
 ACFCEC
Less than 15051.0%42.0%44.0%
150 to 29920.5%27.0%31.0%
300 to 74920.5%18.0%21.0%
750 or more8.0%13.0%4.0%
    
Location of Church
Inner City21.8%20.5%8.0%
Urban14.5%17.5%16.0%
Suburban39.5%46.0%45.0%
Rural23.4%16.0%28.0%
Vacation/Resort Area.8%0.0%3.0%
    
Denominational Affiliation of Church
Baptist28.3%32.8%35.2%
Independent/Non-denom.20.8%18.8%9.1%
Free Will Baptist6.7%3.1%--
Pentecostal (non-specific)5.8%----
United Methodist Church5.0%6.3%4.0%
Assemblies of God2.5%--6.3%
Church of God, Cleveland2.5%3.1%--
Church of God (General)2.5%----
Foursquare Gospel--3.1%--
Evangelical Free Church----4.5%
Independent Fundamental----3.4%
Christian/Churches of Christ----3.4%
Church of the Nazarene----2.8%
Others (25 denoms.)25.9%26.6%31.6%
    
Ethnic/Racial Make-up of Church
Predominantly White (70% & up)60.8%70.2%91.7%
Predominantly African-American (70% & up)25.6%20.8%4.7%
Multi-racial (less than 70% of any one group)6.4%4.5%1.2%
Predominantly Hispanic (70% & up)4.0%3.0%1.2%
Predominantly Oriental (70% & up)3.2%1.5%.6%
    
 KEY
AC = Active ETA Customers
FC = Former ETA Customers
EC = Evangelical Church at large
 

The Church's Dominant Worship Style
 ACFCEC
Evangelical /Traditional44%51%50%
A variety of worship styles16%17%22%
Blended worship16%17%12%
Charismatic13%6%10%
Contemporary and/or Seeker-Sensitive6%6%3%
Liturgical3%--6%
Reformed2%3%3%
    
 KEY
AC = Active ETA Customers
FC = Former ETA Customers
EC = Evangelical Church at large
 

ETA has always been a "niche" ministry. Since its inception in 1930, ETA has focused on providing programs and materials to be used in the equipping and training of adults. Although interdenominational in scope and international in distribution, ETA has never aimed to expand its ministry beyond this niche and thus ETA has not tried to be all things to all churches. ETA has known its appeal is limited to certain types of churches in need of what it offers.

The picture emerging from the above data is that the average church purchasing from ETA:

  • Sunday Morning Worship Attendance between 100 to 250
  • Considers itself either an inner-city or suburban church located in a city from 5,000 to 500,000 in population
  • Is probably either Baptist of some type or independent/non-denominational in affiliation
  • Is either evangelical/traditional in its worship, practices a variety of worship styles or features blended worship
  • 40% of churches using ETA materials are predominantly non-white in racial make-up

It certainly makes sense that small to medium sized churches, with fewer specialized staff members, would utilize what ETA offers more than larger churches with more staff resources. ETA churches are predominantly conservative in their worship styles. Perhaps the most significant finding is the high percentage of predominantly African-American congregations and other minority congregations which use ETA materials. This has not been due to marketing efforts directed to those churches but rather that ETA programs and materials are a particularly good fit with the needs present in those churches.

Christian Education Ministries

Several survey items related to Christian Education.

Christian Education Ministries in Your Church
 ACFCEC
Sunday School for all ages91%91%95%
Youth Ministry80%73%85%
Vacation Bible School74%79%72%
Children's Church Ministry59%61%69%
Small Group Ministry46%45%61%
Bible Institute34%27%14%
Senior Adult Ministry33%30%45%
Club Ministry32%46%39%
Singles Ministry27%22%26%
Other various ministries16%18%23%
Backyard Bible Clubs8%6%13%
Sunday School for Children only8%6%5%
    
 KEY
AC = Active ETA Customers
FC = Former ETA Customers
EC = Evangelical Church at large
 

According to the survey, Sunday School may be losing some ground (between 5% and 9% of responding churches do not have a Sunday School for every age) but it clearly remains in first place among C.E. ministries. It was no surprise youth and children’s ministry were close behind Sunday School in popularity. I conclude the face of C.E. is undergoing change, but the teaching ministry of the church, whether it is called Sunday School or something else, will continue to exist. There will always be a need for trained teachers and workers as long as there are churches.

Christian Education Staff

The survey asked one question relating to church staffing.

Paid staff positions who work in C. E.
 ACFCEC
Churches with paid staff in C.E.41%46%56%
Director/minister of C.E. Part-time23%23%18%
Director/minister of Children Part-time 17%23%16%
Director/minister of Youth Part-time25%23%26%
Director/minister of Adults Part-time8%13%3%
Director/minister of C.E. Full-time21%3%26%
Director/minister of Children Full-time21%23%8%
Director/minister of Youth Full-time47%48%55%
Director/minister of Adults Full-time17%26%13%
    
 KEY
AC = Active ETA Customers
FC = Former ETA Customers
EC = Evangelical Church at large
 

The survey revealed the more C.E. staff a church has the less likely it is to utilize ETA programs and materials. This certainly fits what we had hypothesized. It makes sense that paid church C.E. will tend to develop their own materials for training and equipping rather than purchase pre-packaged materials from ETA or another source.

The data also revealed the dominant C.E. staff position is in youth ministry with children’s ministry staff not far behind. This certainly fits the common assumption that C.E. ministry has moved into specialization rather than generalization in terms of staff responsibility.

Teacher/Leadership Training

Several questions were asked relating specifically to how, when and why Teacher/Leadership training takes place in the church.

Frequency of Teacher/Worker Meetings
 ACFCEC
No meetings13%12%18%
Once a year9%10%12%
Twice a year 14%14%16%
Once a quarter28%22%28%
Once a month18%22%15%
Once a week9%6%2%
Each department sets up its own9%14%9%
    
The purpose of Teacher/Worker Meetings
Organizational maintenance81%84%84%
Training of teachers/workers60%52%60%
Prayer46%41%40%
Follow-up of members/prospects19%20%16%
Study of next week's lesson12%14%6%
    
 KEY
AC = Active ETA Customers
FC = Former ETA Customers
EC = Evangelical Church at large
 

Does the church have a formal Teacher/Leadership (T/L) Training Program
 ACFCEC
Yes39%27%23%
No61%73%77%
    
TActual Classroom time for T/L Training Per Year
1 to 3 hours19.0%6.0%15.3%
4 to 5 hours6.0%19.0%15.3%
6 to 10 hours21.0%25.0%15.3%
11 to 15 hours12.0%19.0%21.0%
16 to 35 hours15.0%25.0%23.0%
36 or more27.0%6.0%10.1%
    
Subjects included in T/L Training
Teaching Methods79%88%92%
Leadership Skills53%65%67%
Basic Bible Doctrine53%35%26%
How to Develop Lesson Plans53%71%51%
Bible Survey47%41%28%
Evangelism/Missions47%41%38%
Specific age group skills47%47%49%
Spiritual Gifts Development40%18%31%
Organization & Administration36%53%51%
Philosophy of Ministry21%35%54%
Church History19%24%8%
Apologetics17%12%8%
Other Subjects2%--10%
    
Curriculum Currently Being Used
ETA66%44%0%
Sunday School Curriculum Publisher58%75%21%
Write Own33%50%38%
Other21%19%59%
Denominational Materials13%6%29%
Church Growth Institute10%13%6%
Walk Thru the Bible10%6%15%
Lay Action Ministry Program (LAMP)0%0%3%
    
Best Time for T/L Training
Friday Night1.6%5.6%3.6%
Saturday23.0%22.2%21.8%
Weekend Retreat8.2%0.0%3.6%
Sunday Morning18.0%33.3%23.7%
Sunday Afternoon9.8%5.6%14.6%
Sunday Night2.0%5.6%3.6%
Weeknight36.1%27.7%25.5%
    
Instructors of your T/L Training (check all that apply)
Volunteer Staff67%53%54%
Paid Staff35%71%79%
Outside Instructors20%24%38%
    
Types of Curriculum Useful in T/L Training
Traditional Classroom Materials71%65%58%
Traditional Supplemented with Video60%53%43%
Traditional Supplemented with Audio31%35%13%
Video as Primary Form of Instruction15%35%30%
Audio ad Primary Form of Instruction10%5%6%
    
Why Do You Not Have a T/L Program?
No Convenient Time55%54%69%
Training Not a Priority51%37%50%
Each Teacher/Leader Gets Their Own35%35%--
We are Too Small31%26%--
Our People are Already Trained25%--34%
We use S.S. Conventions for training----46%
Training just happens naturally----35%
    
 KEY
AC = Active ETA Customers
FC = Former ETA Customers
EC = Evangelical Church at large
 

Churches with formal Teacher/Leadership training programs are more likely to purchase ETA materials. The majority of churches meet at least quarterly to provide training of some kind. The average training program totals from 6 to 35 hours, although a significant percentage of ETA Active Customers (27%) spend more than 36 hours a year in training. It is also interesting to note than ETA Active Customers utilized a higher percentage of "volunteers" as instructors in its training programs than the other two groups.

ETA’s strongest "competitors" are Sunday School publishers and people "writing their own" training curriculum.

Suggestions for ETA Curriculum Development

You Would Like ETA to Develop
 ACFCEC
Intro. to Hermeneutics67%59%N/A
Spiritual Gift Discernment/Developement62%59%N/A
Christian Ethics/Current Events59%49%N/A
Discipleship59%61%N/A
Christian Counseling for Lay People57%54%N/A
Bible Book Studies43%51%N/A
Evaluation, Organization & Admin. of C.E.40%38%N/A
Survey of Eschatology39%28%N/A
Prayer37%36%N/A
What is the Church & How It Functions35%28%N/A
A Course to Train Ushers32%34%N/A
Other Ideas20%8%N/A
    
Formats ETA Should Develop
Self Study/Video67%73%81%
Self Study/CD-ROM42%50%29%
Self Study/Audio36%27%24%
Self Study Via Web Site33%33%18%
None of these12%10%11%
    
 KEY
AC = Active ETA Customers
FC = Former ETA Customers
EC = Evangelical Church at large
 

ETA is using this data to help guide us in future curriculum development. Already ETA is in the process of developing a Christian Ethics course (slated for a July 1999 release) and Introduction to Hermeneutics (slated for a early 2000 release). Other courses in the suggested subject areas above are in the early stages of development.

Also, ETA is aggressively developing video resources. First, video curriculum is being developed to assist the classroom teacher in teaching ETA courses. Second, self-study video courses are being developed which can be used in an individual or small group setting. Production is already underway in providing various aspects of the ETA curriculum (especially instructor materials) in a CD-ROM format.

Conclusions

These three surveys did much to give ETA staff and management a clear picture of its constituency. It not only helped to clarify the profile of the "average" ETA user, but showed clear distinctions between an ETA user church and a non-ETA user. Curriculum subject suggestions have been incorporated into ETA’s curriculum development plan. New uses of technology to enhance the training of adult learners is being aggressively utilized as ETA refines and expands its programs and materials. ETA is listening carefully to its constituencies as it moves into the new century.

Special thanks to Marilyn Banks, Administrative Assistant, for the many hours invested in this research.  A copy of the complete survey with all unedited responses is available, free of charge, to all who request it.  Call 800-369-8291, extension 2, and ask for the "1998 ETA Member School Survey Results."

© 1998 ETA

Motivating Adults to Become Active Participants in Sunday School: An Analysis of Perceptions of Classroom Environment

by Thomas Hutchison, Ph.D.

While ministering as a pastor overseeing the adult education programs of our church, a common discussion was how to encourage adults to participate more regularly and enthusiastically. Programs were designed to encourage a network of relationships to be formed which would create a learning community and enhance the effectiveness of the learning experience together. However, while a core of members participated faithfully, many would attend sporadically, and seemed much less enthusiastic about involvement. We were anxious to accurately identify the reasons for this, so that improvements could be made purposefully which would encourage greater participation.

One particular aspect, which has been analyzed extensively in a variety of settings, including educational institutions, is that of environment. Considerations of this factor include the influence of the teacher on the students, the influence students have on each other, and ways the structure of the class improves or hinders the interaction between members. This is an issue related closely to the function of the church.

This situation focused my research, attempting to provide an objective analysis of perceptions of adults in the church regarding their classroom environment. Thus the data gained would enable the teacher to selectively modify conditions in the classroom with the intent of positively influencing student perception and impacting resulting student behavior.

Ultimately, the question researched was: In adult Sunday School classes, are student’s descriptions of a preferred classroom environment different than their perceptions of the actual classroom environment?

A questionnaire of 118 items addressing 14 different dimensions of the classroom experience was developed. Three different forms were designed; Actual, Ideal (or Preferred), and Teacher’s. Classes were split in half, with each taking different forms of the questionnaire. These two responses were compared to see if statistically significant differences existed between the perceptions of the class of which they were a part and the environment anticipated in an ideal setting. The Teacher’s Form served as a reference point for the teacher in discussion of the information gathered.

Teachers as well as those overseeing these classes responded very positively to the process, as the information provided data to initiate and fuel the assessment of individual classes, and guide intentional modification of their classroom environment.

The Importance of the Educational Environment

Much has been done in school and work settings during the last few decades to establish methods for analyzing educational experience.1 However, little has been done to apply these methods of research in the context of the church. Techniques have been developed and refined for assessing particular aspects of the teaching-learning process. While these could provide much helpful information to the church, it has been largely ignored.

One particular aspect which has been analyzed extensively in a variety of settings, including educational institutions, is that of environment.2 Considerations of this factor include the influence of the teacher on the students, the influence students have on each other, and ways the structure of the class improves or hinders the interaction between members. This is an issue related closely to the function of the church. The impact of the church is based largely on a relational component. People with common beliefs and commitments unite for spiritual encouragement and support in living out those commitments. The impact of